Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2273/2000 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows conviction of a NCO's superior for failing to ensure the driver's duties under Traffic Act s. 61.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2273/2000
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a non-commissioned officer's superior for failing to ensure the driver fulfilled duties under the Traffic Act. The defense argued the superior lacked direct control over the vehicle, but the court found the superior held a duty to supervise the driver's compliance. Consequently, the court ruled that the superior could be held criminally liable for the driver's negligence due to their supervisory role.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Traffic Act s. 61; The superior of a driver is criminally liable for the driver's failure to fulfill statutory duties if the superior failed to ensure the driver's compliance with those duties.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Traffic Act s. 61 non-commissioned officer supervisory duty criminal liability driver negligence vehicle operation command responsibility Haftung bei Verkehrsunfällen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Traffic Act s. 61
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1995_122
Supreme Court dismisses charge of drunk driving where passenger pulled driver's shirt causing loss of control.
appeal_1983_helsinki__557
Passenger's violent grab from driver convicted of minor assault and traffic negligence despite no driving license.
kko-precedent_1989_15
Passenger using handbrake while drunk convicted of gross driving under influence instead of traffic endangerment.
appeal_1976_turku__1247
Court convicts driver and passenger for failing to assist a cyclist after a traffic accident under Finnish traffic law.
kko-precedent_1990_64
Supreme Court allows conviction of 15-year-old moped passenger for helmet violation under Traffic Act s. 89.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko auton kuljettajana toimineen varusmiehen esimies tuomita tekijänä auton kuljettajalle tieliikennelain 61 §:n mukaan kuuluneiden velvollisuuksien laiminlyömisestä.

TLL 61 §