KKO 1822/2000
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for excessive review, ruling lower court exceeded scope of complaint.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision, finding the lower court had reviewed the case more broadly than the complaint indicated. The appellant argued the review was excessive, but the court determined the lower court's actions fell within permissible bounds. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the procedural scope did not warrant overturning the original judgment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 100/1996; 100/1996: The Supreme Court held that a lower court's review must be limited to the scope of the complaint, and exceeding this scope does not justify an appeal.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
excessive review
scope of complaint
procedural error
appeal dismissal
lower court review
Grundsatz ne bis in idem
Vortrittsverletzung
Verfahrensmangel
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 100/1996
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertappeal_1979_eastern-finland__766
Court upheld conviction for aggravated assault, rejecting reformatio in peius request despite new evidence of life-threatening injury.
kko-precedent_2013_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when High Court wrongly denies retrial while altering lower court's reasoning.
kko-other_1998_3079
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding appeal court's failure to examine admissibility of complaint under specific procedural rules.
appeal_1980_rovaniemi__550
Court held two traffic violations constitute one offense when committed in a single act.
kko-other_2016_42
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer case to main hearing on serious drug offenses.
Volltext
Kysymys siitä, oliko hovioikeus tutkinut jutun laajemmin kuin tyytymättömyyttä oli ilmoitettu.