Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 638/1999 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages against a bankrupt company's trustee for concealing assets and debts.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 638/1999
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claim for damages against a trustee who concealed the bankrupt company's assets and debts from third-party creditors. The trustee, previously convicted of fraud, was sued by creditors for failing to disclose the company's financial status during the bankruptcy proceedings. The court ruled that the trustee's actions, while fraudulent, did not create a separate liability for damages to creditors beyond the bankruptcy process itself.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act 1994; Section 2 of the Act on the Liability of Trustees; A trustee's concealment of assets and debts constitutes fraud but does not independently establish a liability for damages to creditors in bankruptcy proceedings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
bankruptcy trustee liability concealment of assets fraud conviction damages creditor claims Supreme Court of Finland vermögensrechtliche Angelegenheit Peculium ungenügende Substanz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act 1994
Section 2 of the Act on the Liability of Trustees
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1998_97
Supreme Court allows damages claim against director for concealing debt in bankruptcy, ruling 150,000 marks due.
kko-precedent_2004_112
Supreme Court allows conviction for concealment of assets during debt arrangement due to failure to report income increase.
kko-other_2004_2554
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding tax income increase and asset concealment in debt restructuring proceedings.
kho-precedent_2000_5
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed tax deduction claim for capital contributions made during debt restructuring proceedings.
kko-other_1998_3454
Supreme Court dismisses claim that spouse's liability for business debt requires proof of obvious recklessness.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli yhtiön konkurssissa pesäluettelon oikeaksi vannoessaan salannut yhtiön omaisuutta ja yhtiön velan kolmannelle. Kysymys velallisen petoksesta rangaistukseen tuomitun A:n vahingonkorvausvelvollisuudesta yhtiön velkojille.