Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding defendant's duty to present evidence of insolvency in criminal proceedings.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the defendant's appeal concerning the obligation to present evidence of the debtor's insolvency. The defendant, a company director, argued that he was not required to prove the company's financial state during criminal proceedings. The court held that the prosecution bears the burden of proving the elements of the crime, and the defendant has no duty to present evidence of insolvency.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki rikosasioista 39/1989; 10. luku: Syyttäjän velvollisuudet: The prosecution bears the burden of proving the elements of the crime, and the accused has no obligation to present evidence of the defendant's insolvency.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys näytön esittämisvelvollisuudesta ja arvioinnista velallisen epärehellisyyttä koskevassa asiassa, jossa syytettynä oli velallisyhtiön toimitusjohtaja.