Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1871/1999 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows return of advance rent to bankrupt company's estate upon creditor's bankruptcy.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1871/1999
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that Company B's bankruptcy estate must return advance rent payments made by Company A to B's estate. Both companies entered bankruptcy, and B's estate sought to terminate the lease agreements, while A's estate claimed the right to recover the funds. The court held that the statutory provision requiring the return of advance payments applies regardless of the subsequent bankruptcy of the recipient, ensuring the paying estate is not unjustly enriched.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

TakSL 15 § 2 mom; The bankruptcy estate of a lessee must return advance rent payments made by the lessor's estate to the lessee's estate, as the statutory obligation to return advances persists independently of the lessee's insolvency status.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
advance rent return bankruptcy estate lessor bankruptcy lessee bankruptcy TakSL advance payment unjust enrichment lease termination Konkursforderung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
TakSL 15 § 2 mom
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2003_112
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; dual recovery orders for same debt do not justify setting aside prior judgment.
kko-precedent_2001_118
Supreme Court allows clawback of payment exceeding security value in bankruptcy without reducing debt by security value.
kko-other_2007_1865
Supreme Court dismissed return request where applicant failed to prove risk of inhuman treatment in Finland.
kko-other_2000_606
Supreme Court allows interest on bankruptcy estate debt awarded under Bankruptcy Act Section 17.2.
kko-precedent_2005_89
Supreme Court dismisses claim that company paid off debt via third party constitutes recoverable asset for bankruptcy estate.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Yhtiö A oli yhtiö B:n kanssa tekemiensä vuokrasopimusten perusteella maksanut vuokra-ajoilta vuokrat kertasuorituksina. Kumpaakin yhtiötä edustanut C oli välittömästi käyttänyt varat B:ltä olevien saataviensa maksuun. A ja B asetettiin sittemmin konkurssiin ja B:n konkurssipesän kanteesta vuokrasopimukset peräytettiin. Kysymys B:n konkurssipesän velvollisuudesta palauttaa maksetut vuokrat A:n konkurssipesälle.

TakSL 15 § 2 mom