Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 724/1998 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses objection to debt restructuring when property gift predates the law's effective date.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 724/1998
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the objection regarding the validity of a debt restructuring plan. The applicant had gifted a property share to parents in 1991, before the relevant debt restructuring law came into force in 1993. The court held that the statutory prohibition on such gifts did not apply retroactively to acts occurring prior to the law's enactment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

VJL 10 § 4 kohta (57/1993); The prohibition on gifting property to relatives for debt restructuring purposes applies only to acts occurring after the law's effective date and does not invalidate prior gifts.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
debt restructuring property gift retroactive application statutory prohibition effective date relatives financial relief Vormietrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
VJL 10 § 4 kohta (57/1993)
VJL 10 § 4 kohta (57/1993)
KI-generiert
kko-other_1996_1219
Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement application where debtor failed to prove insolvency under VJL 10 § 8.
kko-precedent_2014_52
Supreme Court allows debt restructuring despite debt accumulation barrier due to significant hardship and lack of fault.
kko-other_1997_4537
Tax on asset sale proceeds included in debt restructuring plan; court allows tax liability.
kko-precedent_1997_109
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where creditor fails to raise debt restructuring objections in lower court.
admin_1984_uusimaa-county__58
Corporate donation to charity not deductible from business income under ElinkVL 7 and VerotusL 93.1.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A, jonka velkajärjestelyhakemus oli tullut vireille 13.10.1995, oli vuonna 1991 lahjoittanut vanhemmilleen kiinteistönosuuden. Kysymys siitä, oliko A:n velkajärjestelylle yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 10 §:n 4 kohdan (57/1993) mukainen este.

VJL 10 § 4 kohta (57/1993)