Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 4040/1998 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses director's liability claim due to procedural preclusion in lower court.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 4040/1998
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages against the company's managing director. The plaintiff argued the director caused loss through negligence, but the lower court had already rejected the claim based on preclusion rules. The Supreme Court upheld this decision, ruling that the plaintiff failed to pursue the claim within the required time limits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

OYL 15 luku 1 §; OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom: A claim for damages against a company director is barred if the plaintiff fails to file it within the statutory limitation period or if the lower court correctly applies preclusion rules.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
corporate director liability statutory limitation period procedural preclusion damages claim dismissal corporate governance civil procedure rules time bar defense formeller Mangel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
OYL 15 luku 1 §
OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom
OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom (1052/1991)
KI-generiert
kko-other_2002_2150
Supreme Court held lower court must provide compensation in main proceedings when damages are contested.
kko-other_2008_2294
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer case to main hearing on attempted crime.
kko-other_2018_1977
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding refusal of further proceedings permission in fraud case.
kko-other_1997_1608
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court rejected incomplete complaint without notice due to respondent's possession of full document.
kko-other_2001_1715
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to submit criminal case to lower court within statutory time limits.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys osakeyhtiön toimitusjohtajan vahingonkorvausvastuusta ja sen toteuttamisesta. Kysymys tähän liittyen myös prekluusiosta hovioikeudessa.

OYL 15 luku 1 §

OK 25 luku 14 § 2 mom (1052/1991)