KKO 3454/1998
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses claim that spouse's liability for business debt requires proof of obvious recklessness.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim that the defendant was liable for her husband's business debts based on a guarantee. The plaintiff argued the husband incurred debts through obvious recklessness, but the court found no evidence supporting this specific allegation. Consequently, the court ruled that the guarantee obligation stands without requiring proof of the alleged reckless conduct.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertVJL 10 § 7 kohta; A guarantor remains liable for the principal debtor's business debts regardless of whether the debts were incurred through obvious recklessness.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
guarantee liability
business debts
obvious recklessness
spousal liability
Supreme Court ruling
familiärer Härtefall
Familienbetrieb
Mittellosigkeit
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVJL 10 § 7 kohta
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-precedent_1995_158
Supreme Court dismisses lower court's finding of apparent carelessness in guaranteeing children's debts due to family context.
kko-other_1996_1219
Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement application where debtor failed to prove insolvency under VJL 10 § 8.
kko-other_2004_1493
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding debt restructuring obstacles and special exemption under Finnish Debt Restructuring Act.
kko-precedent_1997_166
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement for child based on parents' insolvency and lack of repayment ability.
kko-precedent_1997_142
Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement application due to lack of clear insolvency and potential creditor protection issues.
Volltext
Kysymys siitä, oliko velallinen, joka oli sitoutunut takausvastuuseen puolison liiketoiminnan veloista, velkaantunut ilmeisen kevytmielisesti.
VJL 10 § 7 kohta