Supreme Court dismisses appeal for late submission of insurance claim question despite timely fax receipt.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because the question regarding the insurance claim was submitted late to the insurance court, even though it arrived via fax within the statutory deadline. The appellant argued that the fax transmission constituted timely submission, but the court held that physical delivery to the court's office determines timeliness. Consequently, the procedural defect rendered the question inadmissible for review.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki vakuutusoikeuden toiminnasta 100/1994, 11 §; Vakuutusoikeuslaki 100/1994, 11 §: The question must be physically delivered to the court within the deadline; timely transmission does not cure late physical delivery.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys asiasta, jossa valitus jätetty vakuutusoikeudessa myöhään tehtynä tutkimatta, vaikka se oli telefaxina saapunut määräajassa asianomaiseen vakuutuslaitokseen.