Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 440/1997 KI-generiert

City liable for business loss due to sewage blockage failure to repair and investigate.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 440/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland held the city liable for the company's financial losses resulting from a prolonged sewage blockage. The company suffered customer loss and revenue decline because the city, as owner and maintainer, failed to investigate the cause or fix the defect. The court ruled that the city's negligence in maintaining the infrastructure directly caused the property damage to the business.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Sewage Act; Tort Liability Act: The owner and maintainer of sewage facilities is liable for property damage caused to a third party when failing to investigate or repair a defect leading to nuisance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
sewage facility maintenance tort liability property damage compensation business loss negligence in repair wirtschaftliche Härte nicht wiedergutzumachender Nachteil Wiederherstellungskosten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Sewage Act 1991
Tort Liability Act 1972
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:67
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against environmental permit revocation due to insufficient official investigation of nuisance.
kko-precedent_1995_108
Supreme Court holds fuel station operator liable for pollution damages regardless of fault and insurer must pay.
kko-precedent_1989_129
Supreme Court dismisses claim against race organizer for horse injuries caused by sudden track lighting failure.
kko-precedent_1989_110
Supplier not liable for heating oil damage when client failed to verify equipment suitability after quality change notice.
admin_1988_turku-and-pori-county__301
Administrative court quashes city council's job posting decision due to a one-day error in the application period calculation.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Ravintolatoimintaa harjoittanut yhtiö oli viemärin tukkeutumisesta aiheutuneen ja kuukauden ajan jatkuneen hajuhaitan seurauksena menettänyt asiakkaita ja siten myös tuloja. Kysymys siitä, oliko kaupunki, joka oli viemärilaitoksen omistajana ja ylläpitäjänä laiminlyönyt selvittää hajuhaitan syyn ja korjata vian, tuottamuksensa perusteella velvollinen korvaamaan yhtiölle syntyneen varallisuusvahingon.