KKO 4005/1997
KI-generiert
Supreme Court allows damages claim when criminal charge is dismissed, ruling civil liability persists independently of criminal acquittal.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Finland allowed the plaintiff's claim for damages despite the dismissal of the criminal charge against the defendant. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's actions caused harm, while the defense contended that the lack of criminal conviction negated civil liability. The court ruled that the dismissal of criminal charges does not preclude a separate civil liability assessment based on the same facts.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generierts. 267 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; s. 2 of the Act on Damages for Personal Injury: The dismissal of criminal charges does not automatically bar a civil claim for damages if the underlying facts support liability.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
criminal dismissal
civil damages
independent liability
personal injury
Supreme Court
procedural separation
tort law
Hingabe erfüllungshalber
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generierts. 267 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
s. 2 of the Act on Damages for Personal Injury
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertappeal_1979_eastern-finland__1646
Court dismissed damages claim for non-pecuniary loss due to lack of statutory basis in Finnish law.
kko-precedent_1998_121
Supreme Court allows damages claim against thief despite acquittal due to lack of intent for theft.
insurance_1996_10682-1995
Insurance court dismissed claim where foreign citizen was not summoned and lower court relied on new notice.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:35
Failure to notify defects does not bar damages claim under apartment ownership act maintenance liability rules.
kko-precedent_2002_70
Supreme Court allows partial recovery of court costs where liability was halved but core issue favored plaintiff.
Volltext
Kysymys vahingonkorvauksen tuomitsemisen edellytyksistä, kun syyte rikosasiassa on hylätty.