Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1834/1997 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held customs authority lacked jurisdiction to decide on security measures for trademark infringement cases.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1834/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request regarding the jurisdiction of customs authorities over security measures. The applicant had submitted a trademark infringement case to the courts after customs detained goods under EU Regulation 3295/94. The court ruled that deciding on security measures falls outside the customs authority's competence and belongs to the judicial system.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Regulation 3295/94, Article 6; Regulation 3295/94, Article 7: The customs authority lacks jurisdiction to decide on security measures; such decisions must be made by the judicial authorities.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
customs authority jurisdiction security measures decision trademark infringement case EU Regulation 3295/94 competence division judicial review scope goods detention procedure Gerechter Übergang

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Regulation 3295/94, Article 6
Regulation 3295/94, Article 7

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:1997:72
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; customs seizure under EU regulation remains valid until final court ruling.
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1997_72
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; customs seizure under EU regulation remains valid until final court ruling.
kko-other_2005_2477
Customs duty liability ceases when seized goods are confiscated; seizure constitutes the required control measure under customs code.
kho-precedent_2010_45
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed VAT refund request due to lack of legal certainty and missed appeal deadlines.
kho-other_2026_1623
Supreme Administrative Court allows customs official's appeal, upholding seizure of ATV under EU sanctions.
market_2018_320
Market Court dismisses preservation request as no unreasoned use of confidential technical data is proven.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Tullihallituksen päätöksen perusteella asianomainen tullitoimipaikka oli Euroopan unionin neuvoston asetuksen 3295/94, niin sanotun tuoteväärennösasetuksen, 6 artiklan nojalla pidättänyt tavaroita tullivalvontaan. Kantaja oli saman asetuksen 7 artiklan mukaisesti saattanut tavaramerkin loukkausta koskevan asian tuomioistuimen ratkaistavaksi. Kysymys siitä, minkä viranomaisen toimivaltaan kuului turvaamistoimista päättäminen. Lausunnon antaminen raukesi.

Ks. KKO:1997:72