Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1823/1997 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that a spouse's life tenancy on a gifted house is not a debtor's home under bankruptcy law.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1823/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that a life tenancy held by a spouse on a gifted property constituted a debtor's home under bankruptcy law. The court found that the tenancy was a security interest for a mortgage debt rather than a primary residence owned by the debtor. Consequently, the property was excluded from the definition of a debtor's home for bankruptcy proceedings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

VJL 3 § 1 mom 5 kohta; VJL 3 § 1 mom 8 kohta: A life tenancy held by a spouse on a gifted property, serving as security for a mortgage, does not qualify as a debtor's home under bankruptcy legislation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
bankruptcy law debtor's home life tenancy spousal rights mortgage security property ownership gifted real estate Familienheimstätte

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
VJL 3 § 1 mom 5 kohta
VJL 3 § 1 mom 8 kohta

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:1997:71
Supreme Court dismisses debt relief plan for spouses when child owns mortgaged property used as family home.
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1997_71
Supreme Court dismisses debt relief plan for spouses when child owns mortgaged property used as family home.
insurance_2007_7891-2005
Student's right to housing allowance requires proof of actual costs, not a formal lease.
kko-precedent_2001_23
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement costs for cohabitant's mortgage only if actual contribution or necessity is proven.
kho-precedent_1998_81
Inheritance tax deduction denied for life tenancy retained by donor despite marital relationship.
kko-precedent_1992_168
Supreme Court dismisses wife's claim against husband's creditors regarding hidden joint ownership of property.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Velallisina olevat aviopuolisot hallitsivat alaikäiselle lapselleen lahjoittamallaan kiinteistöllä ollutta asuinrakennusta pidättämänsä elinikäisen asumisoikeuden nojalla. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko kiinteistöä pitää aviopuolisoiden yksityishenkilön velkajärjestelystä annetun lain 3 §:n 8 kohdassa tarkoitettuna velallisen omistusasuntona ja tähän kiinteistöön kohdistuvia panttivelkoja lain 3 §:n 5 kohdassa tarkoitettuina vakuusvelkoina.

Ks. KKO:1997:71

VJL 3 § 1 mom 5 kohta

VJL 3 § 1 mom 8 kohta