Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1768/1997 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed claim for severance pay under Finnish Employment Contracts Act Section 47 F due to lack of statutory grounds.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1768/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for severance pay calculated under Section 47 F of the Employment Contracts Act. The plaintiff sought compensation for the termination of an employment contract without cause, arguing entitlement to statutory severance. The court ruled that the specific conditions required to trigger the calculation method in Section 47 F were not met in this instance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

TSL 47 f §; The statutory severance pay calculation method under Section 47 F of the Employment Contracts Act applies only when the specific legal prerequisites for its application are fulfilled, and cannot be invoked merely upon the termination of a contract without cause.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Employment Contracts Act severance pay calculation termination without cause statutory entitlement Supreme Court of Finland wetterbedingter Arbeitsausfall Verletzung arbeitsvertraglicher Pflichten Verlassen der Arbeitsstelle

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 47 F of the Employment Contracts Act
KI-generiert
labour_1986_33
Labor court dismisses union's fine claim but orders employer to pay severance for unjustified dismissal.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__627
Court dismissed strike claim as employees failed to prove they were forced to work against their will.
appeal_1979_turku__942
Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's decision on criminal liability based on statutory interpretation.
kko-precedent_1995_92
Supreme Court allows termination pay when employer's indefinite suspension effectively ends employment after one year.
labour_2010_65
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated termination protection due to employee's refusal of offered work after warning.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys perusteettoman työsopimuksen purkamisen johdosta työsopimuslain 47 f §:n nojalla suoritettavasta korvauksesta.

TSL 47 f §