Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1608/1997 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court rejected incomplete complaint without notice due to respondent's possession of full document.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1608/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision to reject a complaint without notice. The facts show the lower court rejected the complaint because it was submitted incompletely, yet the respondent had already possessed the full version. The court ruled that the lower court erred in rejecting the complaint without notice since the respondent's possession of the complete document negated the procedural defect.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 26 luku 2 §: The lower court may not reject a complaint without notice if the respondent has already possessed the full version of the complaint, rendering the incompleteness irrelevant.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
complaint rejection without notice procedural defect respondent possession lower court error administrative procedure supreme court review Verfahrensmangel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Korkein oikeus 26 luku 2 §
KI-generiert
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1082
Court dismissed lawyer's claim for costs when client failed to prove authorization despite offered chance to submit power of attorney.
kko-precedent_2012_68
Supreme Court remands appeal case to High Court for retrial due to failure to inform defendant of withdrawal option.
kko-precedent_2013_44
Supreme Court allows appeal on costs in family case without further handling permission as it falls under application proceedings.
kko-precedent_2011_30
Supreme Court remands appeal to High Court for retrial due to procedural error excluding defendant despite lawyer's presence.
kko-precedent_2002_107
Supreme Court allows defense lawyer fees when appeal challenges clear oral evidence in criminal case.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko hovioikeus saanut täydennystä pyytämättä jättää käräjäoikeuden kansliasta sille puutteellisena toimitetun valituksen tutkimatta, kun vastauksesta oli ollut havaittavissa, että valituskirjelmä oli ollut vastaajan käytössä täydellisenä.

OK 26 luku 2 §