Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1302/1997 KI-generiert

Creditor in debt restructuring must pay client's legal costs for opposing debt restructuring application.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1302/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that a creditor in a debt restructuring proceeding must reimburse the debtor for legal costs incurred in opposing the restructuring application. The court held that the creditor, having lost the objection to the restructuring, was liable for the procedural expenses generated by their unsuccessful legal challenge. This decision establishes that the losing party in a debt restructuring objection bears the associated litigation costs.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

VJL 62 § 1 mom; The creditor who loses an objection to a debt restructuring application is liable for the legal costs incurred by the debtor in opposing that application.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
debt restructuring legal costs creditor liability objection procedure client expenses Supreme Court procedural costs Pfandausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
VJL 62 § 1 mom
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1997_41
Supreme Court rules debtor not liable for creditor's appeal costs even if creditor loses the appeal in debt arrangement.
kko-precedent_1998_12
Supreme Court ruled that litigation costs incurred after debt arrangement start do not fall within the arrangement's scope.
kko-other_1997_1300
Creditor in debt restructuring must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.
kko-precedent_2014_52
Supreme Court allows debt restructuring despite debt accumulation barrier due to significant hardship and lack of fault.
kko-other_1996_1219
Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement application where debtor failed to prove insolvency under VJL 10 § 8.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko velkajärjestelyasiassa muutoksenhaun hävinnyt velkoja velvollinen korvaamaan velalliselle muutoksenhakemukseen vastaamisesta aiheutuneet oikeudenkäyntikulut.

VJL 62 § 1 mom (57/93)