Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1297/1997 KI-generiert

Creditor in debt restructuring must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1297/1997
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that a creditor who lost a debt restructuring appeal must reimburse the state for legal fees paid to the debtor's counsel. The creditor argued the state should bear costs, but the court held the creditor is liable for the appeal process expenses. Consequently, the court ordered the creditor to pay the amount advanced by the state to the lawyer.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

MOL 21 § 1 mom; VJL 62 § 1 mom: A creditor who loses a debt restructuring appeal is liable to reimburse the state for legal fees advanced to the debtor's counsel during the appeal proceedings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
debt restructuring legal fees reimbursement state advance payment creditor liability appeal proceedings costs Aufbesserung der Löhne Teuerungsanpassung Rentenverrechnung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
MOL 21 § 1 mom
VJL 62 § 1 mom (57/93)
KI-generiert
kko-other_1997_1300
Creditor in debt restructuring must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.
kko-other_1997_1298
Creditor in debt restructuring must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel on appeal.
kko-other_1997_1301
Creditor in debt arrangement case must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.
kko-precedent_1991_49
Supreme Court purged lower court decision for wrongly applying rent control law on legal costs.
kko-other_2006_702
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding client's duty to reimburse state for opponent's legal costs under the Legal Aid Act.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko velkajärjestelyasiassa muutoksenhaun hävinnyt velkoja velvollinen korvaamaan valtiolle muutoksenhakemukseen vastanneen velallisen oikeudenkäyntiavustajalle hovioikeudessa maksetun palkkion.

MOL 21 § 1 mom

VJL 62 § 1 mom (57/93)