Supreme Court rules partial guarantee expiration does not automatically make remaining liability scattered under guarantee regulations.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court held that a guarantee partially expired under the Guarantee Regulations did not render the remaining liability scattered. The applicant argued the remaining obligation should be treated as scattered, while the opposing party contended the partial expiration left the core liability intact. The court decided that the specific conditions for scattering liability were not met by the partial expiration alone.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAct on the Detailed Determination of the Guarantor's Liability; Act on the Guarantee Regulations: A guarantee partially expired does not automatically render the remaining liability scattered under the guarantee regulations.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kolmen takaajan osalta takaus oli osittain vanhentunut takausmiehen edesvastausvelvollisuuden tarkemmasta määräämisestä annetun asetuksen 4 §:n nojalla. Kysymys siitä, oliko takausvastuu tältä osin saman asetuksen 2 §:n 1 momentin nojalla hajaantunut pääluvun mukaiseksi.