Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 3890/1996 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses prosecution for fraud as the charge was filed after the statute of limitations expired.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 3890/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution against the defendant for serious fraud, ruling that the charge filed in 1993 was time-barred. Although the lower court had convicted the defendant for aiding fraud based on a 1987 incident, the prosecution was formally initiated years later. The court held that the delay in filing the charge rendered the criminal proceedings inadmissible due to the expiration of the limitation period.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Criminal Proceedings; the prosecution is inadmissible if the limitation period for criminal proceedings has expired.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
statute of limitations criminal proceedings time bar prosecution dismissal fraud charge ungenügende Substantiierung von Grundrechtsverletzungen Nachfluchtgrund Verletzung der Begründungspflicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Act on the Limitation of Criminal Proceedings
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:6
Supreme Court quashes conviction for aiding and abetting when principal charges are dismissed due to lack of evidence.
appeal_1984_rovaniemi__358
Court dismisses criminal prosecution due to victim's delayed reporting and lack of public interest.
kko-precedent_1998_40
Supreme Court remands case for clarification of specific criminal acts and legal grounds for conviction.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:6
Supreme Court orders retrial of counterclaim on joint sentence when lower court ignored it.
kko-other_2025_115
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding refusal of continued detention order based on serious crime grounds.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Virallinen syyttäjä oli syyttänyt A:ta 23.7.1987 tapahtuneesta törkeästä petoksesta. Hovioikeus oli, hyläten syytteen enemmälti, tuominnut A:n avunannosta petokseen. Syyttäjän valituksesta syyte, joka oli tullut vireille 14.5.1993, hylättiin vanhentuneena.