Supreme Court held that the court of appeal erred by not requesting the debtor's response to the bank's appeal.

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the bank's appeal against the district court's confirmation of a payment plan, ruling that the court of appeal failed to request the debtor's response. The bank argued the debt arrangement application should be rejected, while the debtor remained silent after the lower court rejected the request for a response. The court decided that the appellate court violated procedural rules by not actively seeking the debtor's position before making a final decision on the debt arrangement.