KKO 346/1996
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding state's liability for litigation costs when opposing party is a public authority.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal concerning the state's obligation to cover litigation costs. The appellant argued that the opposing party, a public authority, should bear the costs under specific statutory provisions. The court ruled that the state is not liable for costs in this context because the opposing party is a public entity exempt from such liability.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertSection 3, Paragraph 1, Chapter 21 of the Act on Court Costs; The state is not liable for litigation costs when the opposing party is a public authority.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
litigation costs
state liability
public authority
court costs
supreme court
legal expenses
cost allocation
fehlende Anspruchsberechtigung
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertSection 3, Paragraph 1, Chapter 21 of the Act on Court Costs
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2020_1662
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against lower courts' rulings on asylum rejection and revocation of residence permit.
kko-other_2007_1683
Supreme Court allows litigation costs claim when first-instance court judgment is final and binding.
kko-precedent_2001_114
Supreme Court allows creditor to recover court costs when debtor did not influence enforcement outcome.
kko-precedent_1997_64
Supreme Court held child custody cases do not allow cost shifting unless specific reasons exist, unlike alimony disputes.
kko-precedent_1998_117
Supreme Court remands case to lower court for fact-finding on creditor's liability claim against heir.
Volltext
Kysymys oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvausvelvollisuudesta.
OK 21 luku 3 § 1 mom (29.7.1948/572)