Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 301/1996 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows partial payment protection claim when installment buyer sues finance company for unpaid balance.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 301/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the installment buyer's claim for payment protection against the finance company. The buyer had paid the full vehicle price to the dealer, but the installment rights and associated protections had been transferred to the finance company. The court ruled that the buyer could still assert payment protection rights against the finance company despite the transfer of the installment agreement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Osamaksusopimuslaki 1994:1000; Osamaksusopimuslaki 1994:1000 10 luku: If the installment buyer has paid the full price to the seller, the buyer retains the right to claim payment protection from the finance company to which the installment rights were transferred.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
installment sale protection finance company liability payment protection claim rights transfer consumer protection law Motorfahrzeugkosten Fahrnispfand Einziehung des Motorfahrzeugs

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Osamaksusopimuslaki 1994:1000

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO 1992:72
Supreme Court dismisses buyer's claim to be freed from installment debt by returning car to seller after transfer to financier.
KI-generiert
kko-other_1997_2285
Finland Supreme Court held that a finance company is not released from obligations when a car is returned to the dealer under a sales agreement.
kko-precedent_1994_29
Finnish Supreme Court denies good faith purchaser protection due to buyer's failure to verify seller's title.
kko-precedent_1996_79
Financing company denied payment due to seller's failure to notify them of contract rescission.
kko-precedent_1992_72
Supreme Court dismisses buyer's claim to be freed from installment debt by returning car to seller after transfer to financier.
kko-precedent_1997_154
Supreme Court dismisses embezzlement charge where defendant sold collateral car to third party before full payment secured by finance company.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Osamaksuostaja oli suorittanut auton loppukauppahinnan myyjäliikkeelle, vaikka osamaksusopimus siihen liittyvine oikeuksineen oli siirtynyt rahoitusliikkeelle. Kysymys osamaksuostajan maksusuojasta rahoitusyhtiöön nähden. Ks. KKO:1992:72