Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2373/1996 KI-generiert

Workplace injury claim dismissed because surgical implant failure was deemed a manufacturing defect, not an accident.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2373/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the employee's claim for work-related injury compensation regarding a torn surgical implant. The employee argued the implant failure constituted a workplace accident, while the employer contended it was a manufacturing defect. The court ruled that the failure of the implant was a product defect rather than an accidental event during work, thus excluding it from work injury coverage.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Työmenetelmäsääntely 1 §; Työtapaturmalaki 1 §: If a surgical implant fails due to a manufacturing defect, the resulting injury is classified as a product defect rather than a workplace accident under the Work Accident Act.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
workplace injury compensation surgical implant failure manufacturing defect work accident definition product liability Supreme Court of Finland work accident act medizinische Arbeitsunfähigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Work Accident Act 1995, Section 1
Work Accident Act 1995, Section 2
KI-generiert
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
kko-other_2011_2942
Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon rupture caused a traffic accident.
kko-other_2007_483
Supreme Court dismissed asylum claim where applicant failed to prove accidental tear of filter membrane caused by trauma.
kko-other_2000_1722
Supreme Court rules that a torn rotator cuff is not a work accident but a personal injury.
kko-other_1998_570
Workplace injury claim dismissed as employee failed to prove causal link between lifting and injury.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Työntekijän olkapää oli työssä tapaturmaisesti vääntynyt. Työntekijän leikkaushoitoa vaatinutta kiertäjäkalvosimen repeämää pidettiin tapaturman seurauksena.