KKO 2234/1996
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when witness testimony is excluded due to failure to hear witness in oral proceedings.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the admissibility of written witness testimony because the witness could not be heard during the oral proceedings. The appellant argued that the written statement should suffice, but the court emphasized the constitutional requirement for oral confrontation in criminal trials. Consequently, the written evidence was deemed inadmissible as it violated the principle of oral proceedings.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 17 § 1 k.r.s.; Art. 17 § 2 k.r.s.: Written witness testimony is inadmissible if the witness was not heard in oral proceedings, as the principle of oral confrontation is a fundamental requirement of criminal procedure.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
oral proceedings principle
witness testimony admissibility
written evidence exclusion
confrontation right
criminal procedure law
unüberzeugende Beweismittel
mangelnder Befangenheitsbeweis
ungenügende Rechtsschrift
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 17 § 1 k.r.s.
Art. 17 § 2 k.r.s.
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2001_1203
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding witness credibility for false statements supported by two witnesses and a guarantee.
kko-precedent_2000_71
Supreme Court allows victim's prior statement as evidence when witness refuses to testify in court.
kko-other_2006_732
Supreme Court held that lower courts must organize a main hearing in robbery cases to ensure procedural fairness.
kko-precedent_2000_62
Supreme Court allows retrial in criminal appeal when lower court misjudged witness credibility without new evidence.
kko-other_2002_188
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to hold oral hearing in administrative case.
Volltext
Kysymys näytön arvioinnista, kun todistajaa ei voitu kuulla suullisessa käsittelyssä.