Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1934/1996 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that a bank's breach of a debt reduction agreement did not create a discharge right for the housing cooperative against the bank.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1934/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that a housing cooperative acquired a discharge right against a bank due to the bank's breach of a debt reduction agreement. The facts showed the bank agreed to reduce its claim against the developer upon selling shares in a housing cooperative, which served as security for the debt. The court ruled that the breach of this specific agreement did not legally trigger a discharge right for the cooperative's assets against the bank's original claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 1000 C: A breach of an agreement to reduce a debt does not automatically create a discharge right for the secured creditor's assets against the original debtor.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
discharge right debt reduction agreement security interest breach of contract housing cooperative creditor's claim Supreme Court Bankenrecht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 1000 C
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1994_54
Supreme Court dismisses bank claim against partner and limited company for third-party debt repayment without benefit.
kko-precedent_1995_144
Supreme Court allows bank claim against borrower for debt arising from a fraudulent loan scheme. The court held that the bank's knowledge of the fraud made the claim not contrary to good faith.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:22
Supreme Court dismisses bank appeal for late argument on price reduction not raised in lower courts.
kko-precedent_1998_47
Supreme Court rules that a mortgage by a housing cooperative against its sole shareholder's debt is void if it harms the cooperative's purpose.
kko-precedent_2009_21
Supreme Court dismisses bankruptcy estate claim against bank for safe debt repayment by director.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Pankin ja grynderin oli näytetty sopineen, että pankki tuli lyhentämään grynderiltä olevaa saatavaansa perustettavan asunto-osakeyhtiön osakkeita myytäessä saatavista kauppahinnoista. Kysymys siitä, oliko asunto-osakeyhtiölle, jonka omaisuus oli vakuutena pankin saatavasta, syntynyt kuittausoikeus pankin velkomusta vastaan pankin rikottua sopimuksen.