Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 19/1996 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed claim against company B for debts of company A due to same business continuity.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 19/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim against company B regarding unpaid wages owed to employees of company A. The court found that company B was merely a continuation of company A's business under the same management, not a separate legal entity liable for prior debts. Consequently, the state was not held responsible for the debts of the predecessor company.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Act on the Liability of the State for Damages; The state is not liable for debts incurred by a predecessor company when the successor entity is established solely to continue the same business under identical management.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
state liability predecessor company business continuity wage claims corporate succession Aufbesserung der Löhne arbeitsrechtlicher Kompetenzkonflikt Wettbewerbsordnung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Act on the Liability of the State for Damages

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:1996:2
Supreme Court allows employer liability for wage guarantees when new company continues failed business under same control.
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KKO:2017:94
Supreme Court holds parent company liable for subsidiary's wage guarantee debt due to single owner control and operational unity.
kko-precedent_1996_2
Supreme Court allows employer liability for wage guarantees when new company continues failed business under same control.
kko-precedent_1992_58
Supreme Court allows creditor's claim against former partner where creditor knew of exit before debt arose.
appeal_1980_eastern-finland__635
Court dismissed husband's claim for unpaid dividends as work was personal sacrifice without future compensation right.
kko-other_1995_890
Shareholder's claim against accountant dismissed; funds misused contrary to shareholder's instructions in bankruptcy proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Korkeimman oikeuden tuomiossa selostetun järjestelyn tarkoituksena katsottiin olleen saman liiketoiminnan jatkaminen konkurssiin ajautuvan osakeyhtiö A:n sijasta samassa määräysvallassa olevassa osakeyhtiö B:ssä. Kysymys B:n vastuusta valtiolle A:n työntekijöille palkkaturvana maksetuista työsuhdesaatavista.

Ks. KKO:1996:2