Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1559/1996 KI-generiert

Supreme Court defines child abduction indicators under old Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1559/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland issued a decision on September 2, 1996, clarifying the specific indicators for child abduction under the Criminal Code provisions valid prior to September 1, 1995. The court addressed a question regarding the precise definition of 'child abduction' as outlined in Chapter 25, Section 2 of the Criminal Code at that time. By interpreting the statutory language, the court established the legal criteria necessary to distinguish this offense from similar crimes involving minors.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2; The court defined the specific indicators constituting the offense of child abduction under the pre-1995 Criminal Code provisions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
child abduction indicators Criminal Code Chapter 25 pre-1995 provisions offense definition Supreme Court interpretation minors protection statutory interpretation Aufenthaltswechsel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Criminal Code Chapter 25 Section 2 (as valid before 1.9.1995)
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1995_110
Supreme Court dismisses request to return children to Switzerland, ruling the mother's move was not wrongful retention under Hague Convention.
kko-other_2005_1278
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding child custody and guardianship decisions by the Social Board.
kko-precedent_2004_76
Supreme Court allows return of abducted children to US despite mother's claim of their objection.
kho-other_2019_5230
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; continued residence denied due to lack of special ties despite age of majority.
kko-precedent_2003_32
Supreme Court allows return of child to US residence despite mother's claim of father's consent.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys ennen 1.9.1995 voimassa olleessa rikoslain 25 luvun 2 §:ssä tarkoitetun lapsenryöstön tunnusmerkistöstä.