Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1517/1996 KI-generiert

Lease termination due to breach by third party does not automatically release lessee from damages liability.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1517/1996
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland ruled that the lessee remained liable for damages after the lease was terminated following the lessor's breach by the third-party seller. Although the lessee had agreed to terminate the contract with the seller and the seller failed to pay the debt, the court found no legal basis to exempt the lessee from their contractual obligations. The decision established that a lessee cannot avoid liability for lease termination damages merely because the lessor's rights were compromised by a third party's breach.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Leasing Act 1994, s. 10; Contract Act 1974, s. 2: A lessee remains liable for damages resulting from lease termination even if the lessor's claim against the third-party seller is unfulfilled, as the lessee's obligation to pay rent and compensate for breach is independent of the lessor's recourse against the seller.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
lease termination liability third party breach lessor recourse rights damages compensation leasing contract obligations Befriedigung der Forderung Sistierung der Versicherung Motorfahrzeugkosten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Leasing Act 1994, s. 10
Contract Act 1974, s. 2
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1988_89
Supreme Court dismissed claim where seller failed to notify buyer of breach and continued lease after breach occurred.
kko-other_1997_2285
Finland Supreme Court held that a finance company is not released from obligations when a car is returned to the dealer under a sales agreement.
kko-precedent_1996_79
Financing company denied payment due to seller's failure to notify them of contract rescission.
kko-other_1996_301
Supreme Court allows partial payment protection claim when installment buyer sues finance company for unpaid balance.
kko-precedent_1992_72
Supreme Court dismisses buyer's claim to be freed from installment debt by returning car to seller after transfer to financier.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Rahoitusyhtiöltä auton vuokrannut oli palauttanut auton sen rahoitusyhtiölle myyneelle autoliikkeelle sopien myyjän kanssa vuokrasopimuksen purkamisesta ja siitä, että myyjä maksaa leasingsopimusvelan rahoitusyhtiölle. Myyjän laiminlyötyä suorituksen rahoitusyhtiö irtisanoi vuokrasopimuksen. Kysymys siitä, oliko vuokralleottaja velvollinen korvaamaan rahoitusyhtiölle vuokrasopimuksen ehtojen mukaisesti vuokrasopimuksen päättymisestä aiheutuneen vahingon.