Supreme Court dismissed claim that 35% annual leave pay was agreed for 38% of gross salary under oral contract.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the claim regarding the calculation of annual leave compensation under an oral employment contract. The employee argued that the agreed 38% of gross salary covered the full annual leave entitlement, while the employer contended the 35% rate applied. The court ruled that the specific percentage of gross salary agreed upon did not automatically equate to the statutory annual leave compensation rate.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertS. 100 of the Employment Contracts Act 1939; s. 100 of the Employment Contracts Act 1939: The percentage of gross salary agreed upon for annual leave compensation does not determine the statutory annual leave entitlement percentage.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys siitä, oliko taksinkuljettajalle suullisen työsopimuksen mukaan maksettavan kokonaiskorvauksen, joka oli 38 prosenttia ajotulosta, sovittu 35 prosenttia ylittävältä osalta olevan vuosilomakorvausta.