Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 393/1995 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim that occupational disease was caused by chemical factors in auto repair work.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 393/1995
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's claim for occupational disease compensation regarding neurological symptoms. The applicant argued that her symptoms were primarily caused by chemical factors in her auto repair job, while the opposing party contended the condition was unrelated to her employment. The court ruled that the evidence failed to establish a probable causal link between the alleged chemical exposure and the applicant's hereditary neurological conditions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

S. 100 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1983; The court held that an applicant's hereditary neurological conditions cannot be deemed an occupational disease if the evidence does not demonstrate a probable causal connection to chemical factors in the employment.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
occupational disease compensation chemical factors causation hereditary neurological conditions auto repair work probable causal connection workmen's compensation act medical evidence standard medizinische Gründe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 100 of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1983
KI-generiert
insurance_1979_7868-1978
Occupational disease claim dismissed; symptoms from 1963 not linked to 1976 solvent exposure.
insurance_1983_10352-1981
Insurance court dismissed claim for occupational disease compensation due to lack of medical causation evidence.
kko-other_2002_793
Supreme Court dismisses claim for occupational solvent poisoning compensation due to lack of causal link between work and illness.
insurance_1985_2062-1984
Court allows disability pension claim when alcohol misuse is a consequence, not cause, of severe illness.
kko-precedent_2001_26
Supreme Court allows occupational disease compensation when indirect exposure is proven by medical evidence despite lack of direct contact.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, olivatko autoverhoilijan hermostoperäiset vaivat todennäköisesti pääasiallisesti aiheutuneet kemiallisista tekijöistä hänen työssään ja siten ammattitautina korvattavia.