Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 3814/1995 KI-generiert

Supreme Court rules that unlimited joint liability guarantors must share debt equally among remaining liable guarantors.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 3814/1995
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that when some guarantors in a joint liability agreement are released due to limitation periods, the remaining guarantors with unlimited liability must share the debt equally. The plaintiff argued for proportional shares based on original contributions, while the defendant contended for equal division among those still liable. The court decided that in the absence of specific allocation terms, equal sharing is the only fair method for unlimited guarantors.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

TakausA 2 § 1 mom; TakausA 2 § 2 mom: When multiple guarantors are jointly liable and some are released from liability, the remaining guarantors with unlimited liability must share the debt equally among themselves.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
joint liability guarantors unlimited liability limitation period release equal debt sharing joint and several liability Prämienbezug Herabsetzung von Unterhaltsbeiträgen Teilweiser Erlass der Geldbuße

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
TakausA 2 § 1 mom
TakausA 2 § 2 mom
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2006_43
Supreme Court allows partial enforcement of joint debt judgment where one debtor's claim prescribes, rejecting application of general prescription rules to negotiable instruments.
kko-other_1997_530
Supreme Court held that a surety's liability remains unchanged even if the creditor's claim against the co-surety is time-barred.
kko-precedent_1996_1
Supreme Court dismisses joint guarantor's claim to negotiate liability due to co-guarantor's settlement.
appeal_1981_turku__739
Guarantee against third party debt does not expire under guarantee statute if not covering specific payment obligation.
kko-precedent_1994_135
Supreme Court held that a co-guarantor's liability remains full if the creditor releases another guarantor based on a prior agreement with the releasing guarantor.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kahdeksan henkilöä oli mennyt omavelkaiseen yhteisvastuulliseen takaukseen samasta velasta. Kolme takaajaa oli rajoittanut takausvastuunsa tiettyyn enimmäismäärään. Osa takaajista oli vapautunut takausvastuusta vanhentumisen johdosta. Kysymys rajoittamattomaan takausvastuuseen sitoutuneen takaajan osuuden määräämisestä.

TakausA 2 § 1 mom