Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2310/1995 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses fraud claim where share transfer documents show buyer received shares and assets at signing.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2310/1995
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim alleging fraud in a share sale transaction. The defendant argued that the buyer received shares and company assets at the time of signing, while the plaintiff contended the transfer was fraudulent. The court ruled that the documentary evidence of the transfer at signing negated the allegation of fraud.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Kauppakirjan 1 luku 100 luku 100; Fraud claims are dismissed where documentary evidence confirms the transfer of shares and assets occurred at the time of signing.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
fraud claim dismissal share transfer fraud company assets transfer signing evidence fraud supreme court ruling berechtigter Anschein der Befangenheit unwahre Angaben über kaufmännische Gewerbe Widerhandlung in Geschäftsbetrieben
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2012_44
Supreme Court allows retrial on price reduction claim due to unclear lower court assessment of buyer's right based on economic error.
kko-other_2001_1654
Supreme Court allows conviction of sole shareholder for accounting offense despite lack of formal board position.
admin_1999_uusimaa-county__598
Administrative court dismissed tax refund claim where dividend distribution was deemed concealed rather than real.
admin_1995_vaasa-county__443
Court dismissed tax evasion claim where company funds paid personal debts were deemed hidden dividends.
kko-other_1996_3125
Supreme Court dismisses fraud charge for selling apartment share to cohabitants without disclosure of prior debt.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli myynyt osakeyhtiön koko osakekannan B:lle. Kauppakirjan mukaan B oli ottanut vastaan yhtiön osakkeet ja varat allekirjoittamishetkellä. Kysymys siitä, mitä yhtiön varoihin oli kuulunut ja oliko A syyllistynyt petokseen kaupan yhteydessä.