Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2302/1995 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses debt arrangement claim where debtors were found not to have incurred debt due to obvious recklessness.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2302/1995
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the application for debt arrangement proceedings initiated by A and B, who had previously been subject to bankruptcy proceedings. Although they had made payments on their mortgage debt between 1989 and 1993, the court examined whether their subsequent debt accumulation regarding the property was due to obvious recklessness. The court concluded that the evidence did not establish the required level of obvious recklessness to exclude the debt from the arrangement plan.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Debt Arrangement Act 1997; Section 10 of the Debt Arrangement Act 1997: A debt arrangement plan may exclude debts incurred due to obvious recklessness if the court finds that the debtor's behavior in incurring the debt was characterized by such recklessness.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
debt arrangement proceedings obvious recklessness mortgage debt bankruptcy proceedings spousal liability financial misconduct Supreme Court of Finland Hilfskonkursverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Debt Arrangement Act 1997
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1995_16
Supreme Court allows debt arrangement for a couple who took a mortgage despite known debts and unrealistic income projections.
admin_1992_vaasa-county__613
Court allows deduction of mortgage interest as other debt interest after spouse buys share in family home.
kho-precedent_1999_39
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding interest deduction for construction debt not yet used as residence.
kko-precedent_2001_99
Supreme Court dismisses bankruptcy order due to lack of evidence for reckless debt accumulation in business operations.
admin_1996_kuopio-county__751
Administrative court dismissed tax claim for extra interest deduction due to lack of qualifying mortgage debt at year-end.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli ylivelkaantunut lähinnä verovelkojen ja vuonna 1989 ostamaansa asuntoa varten ottamansa velan johdosta. Sen jälkeen A oli asetettu konkurssiin ja asiassa oli annettu konkurssituomio. A ja tämän puoliso B, joka sittemmin oli sitoutunut myös velkavastuuseen A:n asuntovelasta, olivat kuitenkin vuosina 1989 - 1993 suorittaneet asuntovelan velanhoitomenoja. A ja B hakivat velkajärjestelyä. Velkajärjestelyn piiriin kuuluivat huomattavalta osalta ne velat, joista kysymys oli ollut A:n konkurssissa.

Kysymys siitä, olivatko A ja B asuntovelan ottamisen johdosta velkaantuneet ilmeisen kevytmielisesti.