Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1137/1995 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; debt collection verified by documents; monitoring approved.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1137/1995
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to approve debt monitoring. The court found that the creditor had thoroughly verified the debt collection system using attached documents and invoices, which clearly identified the claims. Consequently, the court ruled that the monitoring procedure was properly executed and the claims were validly established.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

KS 24 § 1 mom; When a creditor thoroughly verifies debt collection using attached documents and invoices that clearly identify the claims, the monitoring procedure is validly approved.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
debt collection monitoring creditor verification documentary evidence claim identification supreme court appeal procedural approval financial claims Einer besonderen Behandlung unterliegende Dokumente

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KS 24 § 1 mom
KS 24 § 1 mom (3.12.1895)
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1996_155
Supreme Court allows creditor claims in bankruptcy despite incomplete listing due to lack of explicit objection.
kho-other_2017_3819
Court partially allows access to classified emergency plans by redacting sensitive security sections while releasing public parts.
kho-other_2017_524
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal against refusal to release internal quality report containing staff evaluations.
kho-other_2017_1783
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding tax audit report secrecy under Public Administration Act.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:90
Supreme Court allows application documents secrecy but dismisses victim identity secrecy due to insufficient grounds.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Velkoja oli valvonut valvontakirjelmään liitetyistä saatavaerittelystä ja laskujäljennöksistä tarkemmin ilmenevät saatavat. Koska saatavat olivat vaikeuksitta yksilöitävissä näistä asiakirjoista ilmenevien tietojen perusteella, valvonta tuli hyväksyä.

KS 24 § 1 mom (3.12.1895)