Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
HFD:2006:10 KI-generiert

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding child custody and visitation rights under Finnish Basic Law and Family Law.

Geschäftsnummer HFD:2006:10
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal concerning the termination of visitation rights and custody arrangements. The applicant argued that the lower court failed to adequately consider the child's best interests and the impact of the custody change on the relationship with the other parent. The court upheld the decision, ruling that the lower court correctly applied the statutory requirements for modifying custody and visitation under the relevant family law provisions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta; The court held that modifications to custody and visitation rights must strictly adhere to the child's best interests as the primary guiding principle.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
child custody modification visitation rights termination best interests of child family law appeal Supreme Administrative Court Anspruch auf Primarschulunterricht Notwegrecht Massnahme im Vorschulalter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom.
Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta
Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom., 6 § 1 mom., 28 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 6 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 28 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 32 § 1 mom.
Perusopetuslaki 32 § 3 mom.
KI-generiert
admin_2000_turku__98
Municipality not liable for student's home-to-school travel costs when home-to-school distance exceeds five kilometers.
kho-precedent_2016_51
School trip measured from home to school gate; partial transport allowed under basic education law.
kho-other_2020_2869
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal; school travel aid must cover all necessary parent trips including return journeys.
admin_2004_oulu__555
Administrative court dismisses appeal claiming home to preschool commute is too dangerous for a six-year-old child.
insurance_2008_7005-2007
Student bus subsidy allowed when school commute becomes too difficult due to childcare obligations.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Suomen perustuslaki 16 § 1 mom.

Perusopetuslaki 4 § 1 mom., 6 § 1 mom., 28 § 1 mom. sekä 32 § 1 ja 3 mom.

Kunnan sivistystoimen johtosääntö

Laki lapsen huollosta ja tapaamisoikeudesta 7 § 2 kohta ja 9 § 1 mom. 2 kohta

Kort referat på svenska