Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KHO:1999:65 KI-generiert

Construction permit denied because watercourse regulations do not apply to artificial lakes and landowner projects on private land.

Geschäftsnummer KHO:1999:65
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the application for a construction permit for a dam on an artificial lake. The court held that the watercourse regulations in Chapter 2 of the Water Act do not apply because the feature was not a natural watercourse. Furthermore, since the majority of the construction was intended to be carried out by a third-party landowner, the permit could not be issued under Chapter 1, Section 17(2) of the Water Act, which only covers projects causing damage to another's land.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Water Act Chapter 1 Section 2; Water Act Chapter 1 Section 17(2): Construction permits for artificial lakes and projects executed by third parties on private land do not fall under the specific watercourse regulations and damage-based permit requirements.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
artificial lake definition watercourse regulations scope third party landowner construction permit denial private land damage Territorialitätsprinzip örtliche Unzuständigkeit vorsorglicher Landerwerb

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Water Act Chapter 1 Section 2
Water Act Chapter 1 Section 17(2)
KI-generiert
admin_1989_water-superior__50
Administrative court quashes water authority decision for lack of specific property identification and compensation.
kko-precedent_1991_12
Supreme Court allows conviction for water law violation due to operating without valid permit.
admin_1999_water-superior__62
Residence near a water project does not grant standing in a water law permit case.
admin_1988_central-finland-county__744
Administrative court dismissed state's claim to own road area as separate property due to lack of ownership.
admin_1997_water-superior__153
Water law permit denied for cross-border construction without neighbor consent under Finnish Water Act.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Koska uomia, joiden patoamista tekojärven rakentaminen edellytti, ei voitu pitää laissa tarkoitettuna vesistönä, ei rakentamislupaan voitu suoraan soveltaa vesistörakentamista koskevia vesilain 2 luvun säännöksiä. Koska suurin osa suunnitelman mukaisesta rakentamisesta oli tarkoitus suorittaa toisen omistamalla maalla, lupaa ei voitu myöntää myöskään vesilain 1 luvun 17 §:n 2 momentin nojalla, koska sanotun lainkohdan 1 momentin sanamuoto huomioon ottaen lainkohdassa tarkoitetaan vain sellaisia hankkeita, jotka hakija suorittaa omalla tai muutoin laillisesti hallitsemallaan alueella, mutta joiden seuraukset aiheuttavat vahinkoa toisen omistamalle maalle.

Vesilaki 1 luku 2 § ja 17 §