Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KHO:1999:24 KI-generiert

Shareholder dividend taxed on total shares including non-dividend B-class shares for capital income calculation.

Geschäftsnummer KHO:1999:24
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Administrative Court allowed the tax authority's claim that dividends were taxable capital income based on the total value of all shares held. The taxpayer owned 30 shares, with 24 in a non-dividend B-class and 3 in an A-class that received dividends. The court ruled that the 15% annual return calculation for capital income must include the B-class shares' value despite no dividend distribution. Consequently, the tax assessment was upheld because the legal definition of capital income applied to the entire shareholding portfolio.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Tuloverolaki 42 § 1 mom; s. 100 varallisuusverolaki: Dividends are taxable capital income up to the amount corresponding to the mathematical value of all shares held, including those in classes receiving no dividend.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
capital income calculation share class distinction dividend taxation mathematical value taxable base determination Methode der Existenzminimumsberechnung mit Überschussverteilung Umlageverfahren teilweises Obsiegen des Steuerpflichtigen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Tuloverolaki 42 § 1 mom
KI-generiert
admin_2016_helsinki__1320
Administrative Court allows tax deduction based on share ownership at dividend payment time, rejecting prior transfer calculations.
admin_1997_central-finland-county__325
Court held capital gains portion must include all shares owned by taxpayer, not just those receiving dividends.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2019:57
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal on dividend capital income calculation when share ownership changed between dividend payments.
kho-precedent_1998_48
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed tax appeal regarding incorrect calculation of share value and dividend income tax in Finland.
admin_1989_uusimaa-county__970
Court ruled that rental income must be allocated to owners according to their shareholding percentages when no separate agreement exists.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Pörssissä noteeraamattoman osakeyhtiön osakas omisti yhtiön 30 osakkeen osakekannasta 27 osaketta, joista kolme kuului A-sarjaan ja 24 B-sarjaan. Osakeyhtiö jakoi osinkoa vain A-sarjan osakkeille. Osingot ja yhtiöveron hyvitys katsottiin pääomatuloksi siihen määrään saakka, joka vastasi osakkaan omistamien kaikkien osakkeiden varallisuusverolaissa tarkoitetulle matemaattiselle arvolle laskettua 15 prosentin vuotuista tuottoa. Täten pääomatulo-osuuden laskentapohjaan oli luettava myös B-sarjan osakkeet, vaikka niille ei jaettu osinkoa. Verovuosi 1993.

Tuloverolaki 42 § 1 mom