Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KHO:1998:8 KI-generiert

Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal, upholding lower court's rejection of B's transport subsidy claim while allowing A's.

Geschäftsnummer KHO:1998:8
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the lower court's decision to reject B's transport subsidy application while allowing A's. The lower court found B's request lacked sufficient economic and purposefulness criteria compared to A's, despite B's arguments regarding specific operational needs. Consequently, the original decision was upheld, and the case was returned to the lower court for further proceedings.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Transport subsidy Act; The Supreme Administrative Court held that a transport subsidy application must be rejected if the applicant fails to demonstrate the required economic viability and purposefulness of the transport activity compared to other applicants.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
transport subsidy economic viability purposefulness criteria subsidy rejection administrative appeal public transport funding comparative assessment Anspruch auf einen Entscheid

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Transport Subsidy Act 1998
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KHO:2022:49
Supreme Administrative Court allows child's appeal and quashes lower court decision on invalid contact restriction.
admin_2001_vaasa__213
Administrative court dismissed teacher's claim for permanent position after invalid selection process ended.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__257
Court dismissed appeal against tax authority's rejection of execution suspension request under specific statute.
admin_1999_water-superior__74
Administrative court dismisses request for free trial because applicant is not a party to the proceedings.
ECLI:FI:KHO:2023:46
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal despite late filing because administrative court decision was not a binding obligation order.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

KHO katsoi, ettei LH, ottaen huomioon edellä mainitut liikenteen taloudellisuuden ja tarkoituksenmukaisuuden arvioinnissa vaikuttavat seikat, ollut päätöksissään mainituilla perusteilla voinut hyväksyä B:n hakemusta ja hylätä A:n hakemusta. LO:n päätöksen lopputulos pysytettiin ja asia palautettiin LH:lle. ()

Äänestys 4-1