KHO:1997:91
KI-generiert
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal regarding traffic fine imposed by municipal traffic police under Traffic Act.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's appeal against a traffic fine issued by the municipal traffic police. The applicant argued that the traffic police lacked the authority to impose the specific penalty under the relevant Traffic Act provisions. The court held that the statutory provisions clearly granted the traffic police the power to levy such fines, thereby rejecting the applicant's procedural objection.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertTieliikenneA 51 § 1 mom; HallintomenettelyL 15 §: The traffic police are authorized to impose fines under the Traffic Act, and administrative proceedings must comply with the procedural requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
traffic fine authority
municipal traffic police
administrative procedure law
statutory penalty power
appeal dismissal
Auffahrunfall
Verkehrsunfall
übersetzte Geschwindigkeit
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertTieliikenneA 51 § 1 mom (328/1993)
TieliikenneA 51 § 1 mom (328/1993)
HallintomenettelyL 15 §
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertappeal_1982_eastern-finland__2291
Court dismissed claim for damages where plaintiff failed to prove the defendant's liability for the accident.
kko-other_2006_415
Supreme Court dismisses passenger compensation claim under Finnish liability insurance law due to lack of causation.
kko-precedent_1991_87
Supreme Court allows cyclist's partial compensation claim but dismisses criminal liability against the driver.
kko-other_2006_519
Supreme Court allows travel insurance claim for passenger death caused by a third party's negligence.
kko-precedent_2011_90
Supreme Court holds three-year notice period for traffic accident claims starts when claimant has relevant info on damages affecting compensation assessment.
Volltext
TieliikenneA 51 § 1 mom (328/1993)
HallintomenettelyL 15 §