KHO:1997:35
KI-generiert
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed wage security claim due to lack of procedural standing and expired statute of limitations.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's claim for wage security under the Wage Security Act. The applicant argued that unpaid wages constituted a violation of their rights, but the court found the claim procedurally barred. The decision relied on the applicant's failure to meet the strict time limits and standing requirements mandated by the relevant statutes.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertPalkkaturvalain 1 § 1 kohta; 2 a §: The court held that a claim for wage security is inadmissible if the applicant lacks the requisite procedural standing or fails to comply with the statutory time limits for filing such claims.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
wage security act
procedural standing
statute of limitations
administrative court
unpaid wages claim
Wiedereinschulung
Lohnfortzahlung
Wiederausrichtung von Arbeitslosentaggeldern
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertPalkkaturvalain 1 § 1 kohta
Palkkaturvalain 2 a §
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertlabour_2004_69
Labor court partially allowed union claim for damages due to employer failing to offer suitable temporary work during layoff period.
labour_1982_31
Labor court dismissed union fines but awarded damages for unlawful dismissal continuation without proof of breach.
labour_2017_63
Construction union wins partial claim against contractor for unjust dismissal of ironworker due to site bans.
labour_2010_65
Labor court dismisses union claim that employer violated termination protection due to employee's refusal of offered work after warning.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2018:57
Supreme Court dismisses claim that employer failed to offer temporary work to laid-off employees during cost-cutting measures.
Volltext
Äänestys 5+1-2.
PalkkaturvaL 1 § 1 mom
PalkkaturvaL 2 a §