KHO:1997:144
KI-generiert
Child protection appeal dismissed; court upheld social services' removal of child from parents' custody.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the appeal against the decision to remove a child from parental custody. The social services argued that the parents failed to provide adequate care, while the parents contended they were capable of raising the child safely. The court ruled that the evidence supported the necessity of state intervention to protect the child's welfare.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLastensuojelulaki 45 §; Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 §: The court may order the removal of a child from parental custody when there are substantial grounds to believe that the child's well-being is at risk due to the parents' inability to provide adequate care.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
child protection removal
parental custody termination
social services authority
best interests of child
supreme administrative court
Familienasyl
familiärer Härtefall
Aufenthaltswechsel
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLastensuojelulaki 45 §
Sosiaalihuoltolaki 49 §
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertD:3099/3/96
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertECLI:FI:KHO:2025:88
Supreme Administrative Court allows temporary home placement for child during custody despite lack of specific grounds.
admin_1986_aland-county__152
Child custody appeal dismissed because ending care would harm the child's established stability and best interests.
admin_2012_helsinki__953
Administrative court dismisses urgent placement and contact restriction claims under Child Protection Act.
admin_2012_hameenlinna__212
Administrative court dismissed foster care request because custody order is primary over removal under child protection law.
kko-other_2007_1792
Supreme Court allows supervised visitation for child's best interest despite father's objection to supervision.
Volltext
Ks. myös D:3099/3/96
LastensuojeluL 45 §
SosiaalihuoltoL 49 §