Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KHO:1997:12 KI-generiert

Supreme Administrative Court allowed correction of a binding preliminary tax decision's clear clerical error under inheritance and gift tax law.

Geschäftsnummer KHO:1997:12
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Administrative Court permitted the correction of a binding preliminary tax decision regarding inheritance and gift tax. The court found that a clear clerical error in the decision, which resulted in a lower tax assessment than legally due, was corrected under the relevant tax statute. This ruling established that such corrections are permissible when they do not lead to an unreasonable outcome for the taxpayer.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

PerVL 21 a §; HallintomenettelyL 27 §: A binding preliminary tax decision may be substantively corrected for a clear clerical error if the correction does not result in an unreasonable outcome for the taxpayer.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inheritance and gift tax clerical error correction binding preliminary decision tax assessment adjustment unreasonable outcome standard Supreme Administrative Court procedural correction Vollstreckungskosten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
PerVL 21 a §
HallintomenettelyL 27 §
KI-generiert
admin_1991_kuopio-county__110
Advance tax information binding within one year; late claim admissible if submitted before final tax decision.
admin_2014_helsinki__1192
Tax penalty reduced from full amount to 800 euros for late but timely reported rental income.
kho-precedent_2017_143
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed VAT assessment due to lack of statutory rules for foundation construction indirect costs calculation.
kho-precedent_2016_104
Finnish Supreme Administrative Court allows gift tax deduction for retained fund assets despite equal shareholder rights.
kko-precedent_2012_106
Supreme Court dismisses tax fraud charge for 2000-2003 as ne bis in idem applies to prior tax penalty decisions.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Lahjaverotuksessa vero voitiin määrätä perintö- ja lahjaverolain 14 §:n mukaan ja siten tosiasiallisesti oikaista lahjaverotusta koskevassa lainvoimaisessa ennakkotietopäätöksessä ollut veron määrää koskenut ilmeinen kirjoitusvirhe, kun se ei johtanut verovelvolliselle kohtuuttomaan tulokseen. Veron oikea määrä oli 95.600 markkaa, mutta se oli ennakkotietopäätöksessä ilmoitettu 59.600 markaksi.

Äänestys 3-2.

PerVL 21 a §

HallintomenettelyL 27 §