Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 17.2.2000/9077:98 KI-generiert

Unemployment benefits allowed for intermittent work by a self-employed employee of a family company.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 17.2.2000/9077:98
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Unemployment Insurance Court modified the Unemployment Security Board's decision to grant unemployment benefits to a son working intermittently for his father's company. The applicant argued that as a self-employed employee, his work did not require continuous interruption for four months to qualify. The court ruled in favor of the applicant, establishing that such intermittent work patterns are permissible for self-employed employees seeking benefits.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Unemployment Security Act; Unemployment Insurance Act: Unemployment benefits may be granted to self-employed employees whose work is not continuously interrupted for four months.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
unemployment security self-employed employee intermittent work family company benefit eligibility zumutbare Resterwerbsfähigkeit Heimarbeitsvertrag Übergangstaggeld

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Unemployment Security Act
Unemployment Insurance Act
KI-generiert
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1241
Court dismissed unemployment benefit claim as income when recipient refused offered work.
insurance_2006_10193-2004
Court allows unemployment benefits by ruling that active job seeking outside the employment office is a valid reason for absence.
insurance_2001_1402-2000
Court allowed unemployment benefits by ruling seasonal business due to weather does not break continuous employment requirement.
insurance_2002_10516-2000
Court dismissed unemployment claim where part-time work averaged 18 hours weekly but failed periodical work requirements for smoothing periods.
insurance_2002_3335-2001
Court allows unemployment benefits when vocational training completion is voluntary and not a mandatory prerequisite for a final exam.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli kotona asuvan poikansa omistaman osakeyhtiön työntekijänä tehnyt yhdelle toimeksiantajalle, maaseutukeskukselle, ympäristönhoito-ohjelmia maaseutukeskuksen antamien osoitetietojen pohjalta. A haki työttömyyspäivärahaa työjaksojen välisiltä ajoilta. Koska kysymys oli palkansaajan rinnastettavasta yrittäjästä, päivärahan saaminen ei edellyttänyt, että toiminnan olisi tullut olla yhdenjaksoisesti keskeytyneenä neljän kuukauden ajan. Työttömyysturvalautakunnan päätöstä muutettiin.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: