Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 3.5.2000/4750:99 KI-generiert

Study support denied for US resident without Finnish permanent residence; temporary stay not recognized.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 3.5.2000/4750:99
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court dismissed the applicant's claim for study support, ruling that his residence in the USA since 1992 was not temporary. The applicant argued for support based on his studies abroad, but the court found no permanent residence in Finland. Consequently, the appeal committee's decision to deny support was upheld and the final appeal rejected.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

VakO 1 §; 1 §: Residence abroad must be temporary to qualify for study support; long-term absence without Finnish permanent residence precludes entitlement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
study support eligibility temporary residence requirement foreign study funding permanent residence status insurance court decision Ausreise Aufenthaltsrecht von Ausländern Auslands- und Expatriierungszulage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
VakO 1 §
KI-generiert
admin_2022_helsinki__2699
Family reunification residence permit denied when spouse no longer resides in Finland under the Act on the Status of Aliens.
admin_1999_helsinki__5048
Foreign national with Finnish residence lost citizenship due to temporary stay abroad not breaking continuity.
insurance_2015_5670-2013
Court allows student loan for abroad studies when foreign stay is temporary due to father's work.
insurance_2001_2990-2000
Court dismissed claim that intermittent foreign work breaks continuous residence for social security purposes.
insurance_2000_3771-1999
Study abroad stay deemed permanent; family history irrelevant; appeal dismissed for non-temporary residence.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli asunut isänsä työn vuoksi USA:ssa vuodesta 1992 lähtien eikä hänellä ollut ollut vakinaista kotikuntaa Suomessa tämän jälkeen. VakO katsoi, ettei A:n oleskelua ulkomailla voitu pitää tilapäisenä. A:lle ei näin ollen voitu myöntää opintotukea hänen USA:ssa harjoittamiaan opintoja varten. Opintotuen muutoksenhakulautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Valitus hylättiin.

Jaosto:V Äänestys: