Insurance court dismissed claim for additional premium due to insurer's failure to notify policyholder of premium increase.

The Insurance Court dismissed the policyholder's claim for an additional premium following a late notification of a rate increase. The insurer argued the increase was necessary for solvency, while the policyholder contended the late notice violated contractual transparency requirements. The court ruled that without explicit contractual clauses mandating such notification, the insurer's unilateral action was invalid.