Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 30.8.2000/3771:99 KI-generiert

Study abroad stay deemed permanent; family history irrelevant; appeal dismissed for non-temporary residence.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 30.8.2000/3771:99
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court dismissed the appeal against the study support committee's decision to deny temporary residence status. The applicant had lived in Australia for five years before returning to Finland for university, arguing family history should influence the temporary stay assessment. The court ruled that family background is irrelevant and focused solely on the applicant's actual behavior and circumstances, finding the stay non-temporary.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Study Support Act; Temporary Residence Act: Family history carries no weight in assessing temporary residence; the court evaluates the applicant's actual conduct and circumstances to determine if a stay abroad is temporary.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
study support temporary residence family history non-temporary stay appeal dismissal residence status applicant conduct längerer Auslandsaufenthalt

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Study Support Act
Temporary Residence Act
KI-generiert
insurance_2015_5670-2013
Court allows student loan for abroad studies when foreign stay is temporary due to father's work.
insurance_2004_8951-2002
Finland insurance court dismissed study aid claim due to lack of two-year Finnish domicile before studies.
admin_1999_helsinki__5048
Foreign national with Finnish residence lost citizenship due to temporary stay abroad not breaking continuity.
kho-precedent_1997_52
Foreign resident's permanent residence permit application dismissed due to lack of permanent stay in home country.
kho-precedent_2007_31
Citizenship denied to athlete spouse as continuous residence requirement not met despite marriage.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli muuttanut Australiaan vuonna 1993 ja opiskellut siellä viisi vuotta ennen yliopisto-opiskeluaan Suomessa. VakO katsoi, että arvioitaessa sitä, onko henkilön oleskelu ulkomailla opintotukilaissa tarkoitetulla tavalla tilapäistä, ei A:n esittämälle selvitykselle sukunsa historiasta voida antaa juurikaan painoa, vaan tarkastelun kohteena on opintotuen hakijan oma käyttäytyminen ja olosuhteet. A:n oleskelua ulkomailla ei voitu pitää tilapäisenä oleskeluna. Opintotuen muutoksenhakulautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Valitus hylättiin.

Jaosto:VI Äänestys: