Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 22.5.1984/366:84 KI-generiert

Work injury claim dismissed because laundry accident at a laundromat did not occur during agricultural work duties.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 22.5.1984/366:84
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Agricultural Pension Fund denied compensation for a farmer who slipped and injured his arm while washing laundry containing both leisure and work clothes. The Accident Board rejected the claim, ruling the incident did not happen during agricultural work or related conditions, a decision upheld by the court. The court dismissed the appeal because the activity of washing mixed laundry at a laundromat was not considered part of the farmer's professional duties or work-related circumstances.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Act 1984; Accident Board Act 1984: An accident occurring while washing mixed leisure and work clothes at a laundromat is not considered a work-related injury if it does not take place during the performance of professional duties or in work-related conditions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
agricultural work injury laundry accident mixed clothing work-related conditions professional duties accident board compensation denial Arbeitsausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Insurance Act 1984
Accident Board Act 1984
KI-generiert
insurance_1984_2422-1984
Insurance court dismissed claim that summer farm work constituted an employment relationship under the Workmen's Compensation Act.
labour_1974_88
Labor unions fined for failing to take sufficient measures to restore peace during strikes.
labour_2006_1
Employer dismissed worker; union won damages; unemployment fund's cost claim dismissed.
labour_1981_142
Union dismissed for failing to stop intermittent strikes violating collective agreement management rights.
labour_1971_13
Labor court dismisses union compensation claims for violating work peace obligations during strikes.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Henkilö oli pessyt pesutuvassa pyykkiä, joka käsitti sekä vapaa-ajanvaatteita että työvaatteita, liukastunut ja kaatunut vahingoittuen oikeaan yläraajaan. Maatalousyrittäjien eläkelaitos oli evännyt korvauksen ja tapaturmalautakunta oli hylännyt valituksen katsoen, ettei tapaturma ollut sattunut maatalousyrittäjätyössä tai siitä johtuvissa olosuhteissa. Tapaturmalautakunnan päätöstä ei muutettu. Laajennettu jaosto (äänestys 4-3)