Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 30.6.1983/4964:82 KI-generiert

Unemployment benefit claim dismissed due to fraudulent certification and improper payment periods.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 30.6.1983/4964:82
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court dismissed the claimant's request to reinstate unemployment benefits after the Employment Office declared the certification fraudulent. The Employment Office identified that benefits were improperly paid during three specific periods in 1981 and 1982, leading to the annulment of the benefit decision. The court upheld the annulment because the initial certification was based on false information, rendering the benefit entitlement invalid.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 10 of the Unemployment Benefit Act 1982; The court annuls a benefit decision when the underlying certification is proven false and benefits were paid for periods not covered by the claimant's eligibility.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
unemployment benefit annulment fraudulent certification improper payment periods employment office error benefit eligibility glaubhafte Erklärung verspätete Begründung Ursachenanalyse

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 10 of the Unemployment Benefit Act 1982
KI-generiert
insurance_1987_6082-1986
Unemployment benefit claim dismissed because claim period exceeded 360 days without national assistance.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__1241
Court dismissed unemployment benefit claim as income when recipient refused offered work.
insurance_1984_1907-1983
Insurance court dismissed appeal regarding pension type change from partial to full disability pension.
insurance_1984_3527-1983
Insurance court dismissed early pension claim as less favorable than unemployment benefit.
insurance_2000_3648-1999
Self-employed status under unemployment insurance law bars membership termination due to permanent exit from employment.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Henkilölle oli myönnetty työttömyyseläke työvoimaviranomaisen 29.4.1982 antaman todistuksen perusteella. Työvoimatoimisto ilmoitti, että todistus oli virheellinen, koska työttömyyskorvausta oli maksettu perusteettomasti 13.7.-31.7.1981, 31.12.1981 ja 1.3.-30.4.1982. Väärään selvitykseen perustunut työttömyyseläkepäätös purettiin. II -jaosto.