Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 29.3.1983/3775:82 KI-generiert

Insurance court dismissed claim for disability pension due to insufficient evidence of severe occupational strain.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 29.3.1983/3775:82
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Finnish Insurance Court dismissed the claim for disability pension filed by a 58-year-old merchant operating a private business from 1948 to 1981. The applicant argued that his continuous standing work and long daily hours constituted severe occupational strain, but the court found the evidence insufficient to meet the threshold for pension eligibility. Consequently, the application was rejected because the documented conditions did not substantiate the legal requirement for a disability pension.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Act; Disability Pension Act: Severe occupational strain must be substantiated by concrete evidence of continuous standing work and excessive daily hours to qualify for a disability pension.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
disability pension occupational strain private merchant standing work insurance court severe strain pension eligibility Arbeitsphysiologie

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Insurance Act
Disability Pension Act
KI-generiert
insurance_1983_11175-1981
Occupational disease compensation allowed for shoulder inflammation caused by working at height.
insurance_1982_4159-1982
Insurance court dismisses claim by employee claiming disability benefits due to non-disabling work conditions.
insurance_1983_3327-1982
Insurance court dismisses claim for disability pension when mental stress is not the sole cause of illness.
insurance_1980_10836-1979
Insurance court dismissed claim for occupational disease compensation due to lack of causal link between work and injury.
insurance_1983_9101-1981
Occupational disease compensation denied; court ruled symptoms stemmed from increased workload rather than physical factors.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Vuosina 1948-1981 torikauppiaana toimineen 58 -vuotiaan yrittäjän katsottiin olleen rasittavasa työssä. Ratkaisua tehtäessä otettiin huomioon työn luonne yksityisyrittäjänä, jatkuva seisomatyö ja työpäivien pituus. VI-jaosto