Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VakO 5.10.1982/11626:81 KI-generiert

Insurance court denied disability compensation for shoulder periarthritis unrelated to the original workplace accident.

Geschäftsnummer VakO 5.10.1982/11626:81
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Insurance Court dismissed the claim for disability compensation regarding shoulder periarthritis diagnosed one year after a workplace fall. The employee argued the inflammation was a consequence of the initial injury, while the insurer contended the condition was a separate, unrelated medical issue. The court ruled that no causal link existed between the accident and the subsequent inflammation, thereby rejecting the compensation request.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Act s. 10; Work Accident Act s. 10: Compensation is only payable for injuries directly caused by the accident; unrelated subsequent conditions like periarthritis do not qualify.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
workplace accident disability compensation causal link shoulder periarthritis insurance liability medical causation injury exclusion veraltetes medizinisches Gutachten

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Insurance Act s. 10
Work Accident Act s. 10
KI-generiert
kko-other_2009_2468
Supreme Court held work injury benefits for right elbow pain after August 2006 were not causally linked to November 2004 accident.
insurance_1980_6034-1979
Court allows partial compensation for shoulder injury where accident aggravated pre-existing arthritis and caused partial rotator cuff tear.
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
kko-other_1998_2807
Work accident compensation allowed for fall on bicycle causing shoulder injury during business trip.
kko-other_2012_2460
Supreme Court dismissed claim for compensation where pain in left upper limb was not causally linked to the 2007 accident.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Työntekijä oli asennustyössä jyrkällä ja liukkaalla rinteellä liukastunut ja kaatunut maahan lyöden oikean olkapäänsä seurauksin, että siihen oli tullut ruhjevamma. Noin vuoden kuluttua olkapäässä, joka tapaturman jälkeen oli ollut kivulias, oli todettu olkanivelen ympärystulehdus. VAKO epäsi korvauksen olkanivelen ympärystulehduksesta. VI -jaosto KKO 27.9.1983=VAKO (Lääkintöhallitus: Kettunen)